Run team retrospectives easily, quickly, and absolutely FREE
get started
The ‘what went well’ retrospective format is one of the easiest and most efficient methods for your agile team to complete their sprint retrospectives. This retro opens discussions on what went well during the previous sprint, as well as what didn’t go well (or as planned). Post discussion, team members decide upon specific action items to improve future engagement and sprint results.
The ‘what went well’ retrospective is a very basic sprint retrospective format that your team can easily run.
This simplistic but effective sprint format is a method used at post-project meetings to reflect on past ventures and to plan for future ones. It consists of two segments, taking place in the following recommended order:
Scrum/team members take a quantitative look at the past sprint and identify what aspects didn't work for them and essentially vote to put those methods/techniques into the toss pile.
Members may have different feelings about the method/technique in question, making it a good time to investigate why it may or may not have empowered some members' processes.
Bringing up the stressors first is often easier, as negative experiences tend to stick out more vividly than positive ones (unfortunately). Members can unpack their frustrations together.
Leaving the meeting on a positive note is cathartic after heavy unloading. It leaves members in a motivated state of mind for the future venture.
This portion of the meeting will cover the methods/techniques (etc) that did serve the team and its goals positively, landing them in a proverbial keep pile. Again, some members may not see eye-to-eye on a certain topic and all perspectives will prove useful through further discussion.
This format, like most, should be used soon after a project comes to an end and before a new one begins. The feedback and associated feelings (frustration, pride, enthusiasm, etc) should still be fresh and vivid enough to discuss in detail.
Efficient and focused meetings can take place physically or virtually on a user-friendly platform like GoRetro. In essence, members can write their negative/positive feedback on sticky notes or comment threads and discuss and vote on the opinions of the topic.
In the ‘what didn’t go well’, or 'constructive critique' portion, members should clearly state the issue (without a solution at first), and then open the floor to counter-arguments, followed by solutions (with actionable tasks/goals). Noticing common patterns among things that don't work can present clarity as well.
In the ‘what went well’, or 'pleased' portion, members should give credit where it's due, uplift each other, and reflect on why certain things seem to work well.
With so many templates to choose from, GoRetro makes setting up a collaborative organizational platform so easy.
Once logged in, members can be invited to partake in discussions, voting, suggestions, assigning, and presenting.
Everything on the boards is customizable and easily sorted, and with clear goals discussed, actionable items can be assigned to members publicly or privately with due dates and details. All past discussions are fully accessible for future reference and retrospectives too!
This format, like all other retrospective formats, is to be conducted with every single team member present. Every member holds a unique individual experience and feedback from their own perspective and the conversation must have the balance of everyone's voice.
Other relevant feedback is also often welcome from customers/market results, partners, and team leaders/management.
This format isn't overwhelming or complicated - it's very black and white. Sometimes that contrast is a great way to find patterns for what seems to work with this particular set of people and what doesn't. Methods can then be refined to improve in the future.
This method is a great way to vent and fix frustrations, only to then end on a high note of all that went well and an acknowledgment of everyone's strengths to embrace in the future.
With such a unique dichotomous quality, having an online retrospective tool like GoRetro makes it really easy to organize the contrasting dualistic ideas into clear fixes, agreements, and tasks.
The ‘what went well’ retrospective format is one of the easiest and most efficient methods for your agile team to complete their sprint retrospectives. This retro opens discussions on what went well during the previous sprint, as well as what didn’t go well (or as planned). Post discussion, team members decide upon specific action items to improve future engagement and sprint results.
The ‘what went well’ retrospective is a very basic sprint retrospective format that your team can easily run.
This simplistic but effective sprint format is a method used at post-project meetings to reflect on past ventures and to plan for future ones. It consists of two segments, taking place in the following recommended order:
Scrum/team members take a quantitative look at the past sprint and identify what aspects didn't work for them and essentially vote to put those methods/techniques into the toss pile.
Members may have different feelings about the method/technique in question, making it a good time to investigate why it may or may not have empowered some members' processes.
Bringing up the stressors first is often easier, as negative experiences tend to stick out more vividly than positive ones (unfortunately). Members can unpack their frustrations together.
Leaving the meeting on a positive note is cathartic after heavy unloading. It leaves members in a motivated state of mind for the future venture.
This portion of the meeting will cover the methods/techniques (etc) that did serve the team and its goals positively, landing them in a proverbial keep pile. Again, some members may not see eye-to-eye on a certain topic and all perspectives will prove useful through further discussion.
This format, like most, should be used soon after a project comes to an end and before a new one begins. The feedback and associated feelings (frustration, pride, enthusiasm, etc) should still be fresh and vivid enough to discuss in detail.
Efficient and focused meetings can take place physically or virtually on a user-friendly platform like GoRetro. In essence, members can write their negative/positive feedback on sticky notes or comment threads and discuss and vote on the opinions of the topic.
In the ‘what didn’t go well’, or 'constructive critique' portion, members should clearly state the issue (without a solution at first), and then open the floor to counter-arguments, followed by solutions (with actionable tasks/goals). Noticing common patterns among things that don't work can present clarity as well.
In the ‘what went well’, or 'pleased' portion, members should give credit where it's due, uplift each other, and reflect on why certain things seem to work well.
With so many templates to choose from, GoRetro makes setting up a collaborative organizational platform so easy.
Once logged in, members can be invited to partake in discussions, voting, suggestions, assigning, and presenting.
Everything on the boards is customizable and easily sorted, and with clear goals discussed, actionable items can be assigned to members publicly or privately with due dates and details. All past discussions are fully accessible for future reference and retrospectives too!
This format, like all other retrospective formats, is to be conducted with every single team member present. Every member holds a unique individual experience and feedback from their own perspective and the conversation must have the balance of everyone's voice.
Other relevant feedback is also often welcome from customers/market results, partners, and team leaders/management.
This format isn't overwhelming or complicated - it's very black and white. Sometimes that contrast is a great way to find patterns for what seems to work with this particular set of people and what doesn't. Methods can then be refined to improve in the future.
This method is a great way to vent and fix frustrations, only to then end on a high note of all that went well and an acknowledgment of everyone's strengths to embrace in the future.
With such a unique dichotomous quality, having an online retrospective tool like GoRetro makes it really easy to organize the contrasting dualistic ideas into clear fixes, agreements, and tasks.
